The New Mexico Department of Transportation, with the assistance of
the SRI Foundation, sponsored the 2005 Transportation Research
Board (TRB) summer
meeting of the ADC10 Committee on Environmental Analysis in Transportation,
the ADC50 Committee on Historic and Archaeological Preservation
in Transportation, and the ABE80 Committee on Native American Transportation
Issues. This conference brought together over 200 transportation
and environmental professionals
from around the
country to review and critique past national efforts involving environmental
streamlining and stewardship. The benefits and problems associated
with these efforts were examined from the perspective of Tribes, the
public, and environmental and transportation professionals. Presenters
and attendees included key staff from Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA) headquarters, state FWHA division offices, state Departments
of Transportation (DOT) environmental and design offices, Tribes, Federal
and state environmental resource agencies, non-profit environmental
organizations, and private sector firms. During the conference, there
were many opportunities, both structured and informal, for discussions
and networking about environmental streamlining and stewardship.
The conference format
differed somewhat from past TRB summer meetings. The first day of the
conference began with a two-part plenary session. First, six plenary
speakers addressed the conference theme, presenting their responses
to the following questions: What are streamlining and stewardship?
Have we really streamlined projects and programs, and have we become
better stewards? How do we know when we have done streamlining and
stewardship? What are the practical, realistic outcomes of streamlining
and stewardship? The plenary speakers were:
• Alan Downer,
Navajo Nation
• Don Klima, Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
• Wayne Kober, Wayne W. Kober, Inc.
• William Malley, Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P.
• Michael Replogle, Environmental Defense
• Lamar Smith, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Project Development
and Environmental Review
The second part of
the plenary session showcased four key projects and programs from around
the country that exemplify the successes and challenges of stewardship
and streamlining. The plenary session was followed in the afternoon
by the three committees' sessions.
Day two of the conference
began with a joint session of the three committees. The subject of
this session was tribal consultation in the context of the National
Environmental Policy Act and Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation
Act. After this session, conference participants broke into
small groups. Each group, under the direction of a trained facilitator,
discussed the conference theme by addressing the following questions:
Question
#1: In
the ideal world of transportation decision making and environmental
compliance, what would streamlining and stewardship look
like, and what would it accomplish?
Question
#2: What
are the gaps between the ideal of streamlining and stewardship
and the current reality, and what are the impediments to achieving
the ideal?
Question
#3: What
tools and strategies can we use to help us achieve streamlining
and stewardship and overcome these impediments? How can TRB help
(through research or a study)?
On the morning of
the third and last day of the conference, all participants reconvened,
and each breakout group presented a brief report on their group's discussions
and recommendations. This was followed by a time for general comments
and discussion from the audience. As a final wrap-up, the plenary
session speakers presented their views and opinions
about what they heard during the sessions and small group discussions,
ending with their recommendations on where to go from here.
|
Conference Proceedings
Environmental Stewardship and Streamlining: Fact or Fiction
Section One: Plenary
Session
Plenary Session • Part 1
Plenary session
speakers addressed the conference theme, presenting their responses
to the following questions: What are streamlining and stewardship?
Have we really streamlined projects and programs, and have we become
better stewards? How do we know when we have done streamlining and
stewardship? What are the practical, realistic outcomes of streamlining
and stewardship?
• |
Alan
Downer, Navajo Nation |
• |
Don Klima,
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation |
• |
Wayne Kober,
Wayne W. Kober, Inc |
• |
William
Malley (pdf 7.7 MB), Akin,
Gump,
Strauss,
Hauer & Feld, L.L.P. |
• |
Michael
Replogle (pdf 896 KB), Environmental Defense |
• |
Lamar
Smith, (pdf 112 KB) notes (pdf
128 KB) Federal Highway Administration, Office of Project Development
and Environmental Review |
Plenary Session
- Part 2
Section
Two: Committee Breakout Sessions Native
American Transportation Issues Committee (ABE80)
• |
"Overview
of Environmental Streamlining and the Role of the Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation," (pdf 4.6 MB) Carol
Legard, Advisory Council on Historic Preservation |
• |
"The
Ties that Bind: Pennsylvania Efforts to Build Relationships
with Tribes," (pdf 2.7 MB) Deborah Suciu-Smith, FHWA
Pennsylvania Division
and Catherine
Spohn, Pennsylvania DOT |
• |
"'Walking
Together' Can Mean Stopping a Project: How the Washington State
Department of Transportation and the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe
Managed
a Decision to Stop a Major Project," Frances Charles, Lower Elwha Klallam
Tribe; Colleen Jollie, Washington State DOT; Allyson Brooks, Washington State
Historic Preservation Officer; and Trent deBoer, Washington State DOT |
• |
"Transportation
Issues of Indian Country: The California Experience," Joseph
Meyer, Caltrans Native American Advisory Committee |
Environmental Analysis
in Transportation Committee (ADC10)
• |
"Transportation
Permit Streamlining at Washington State DOT," Carrie Berry,
Washington State DOT |
• |
"An
Environmental Streamlining Success Today and a Building Block
for Tomorrow: Louisiana 1 Improvements Project," (pdf
1.3 MB) Michele Deshotels, Louisiana DOTD and Chris Gesing,
Michael Baker Jr., Inc. |
• |
"Section
4(f): Live, Local and
Late Breaking!," (pdf 3.1 MB) Dave Gamble,
FHWA |
• |
"Streamlining
the Runway 17-35 Extension EIS Process at the Philadelphia
International Airport, " (pdf 1.5 MB) Frank Bracaglia,
VHB |
• |
"Merging
CSS and Streamlining
on US 285, Colorado," (pdf 1.4 MB) Gina McAfee,
Carter & Burgess |
• |
"Pikes
Peak COG, Regional
Cumulative Impacts Study," (pdf 1.1 MB) Katiann
Wong-Murillo, FHWA |
• |
"Environmental
Streamlining on the STEP UP Project," (pdf 1.3 MB)
Tracey
MacDonald, Carter & Burgess and Suzette Thieman, North Front Range MPO, Fort
Collins |
Historic
and Archaeological Preservation in Transportation Committee (ADC50)
• |
Programmatic
Agreements Panel Discussion: |
|
• |
"The
Washington SHPO's Views of Washington FHWA/DOT's Programmatic
Agreement," Allyson Brooks, Washington State Historic Preservation
Officer |
|
• |
"Whereases
and Therefores: Streamlining Section 106 on Oregon Department
of Transportation Projects," Robert Hadlow, Oregon DOT |
|
• |
"The
Minor Projects Programmatic Agreement: Where It's Been and Where
It's Going," Joseph Baker and Jonathan Daily, Pennsylvania
DOT and Mark Shaffer, Pennsylvania Historical Museum Commission |
|
• |
"The
Idaho PA: A Successful Work in Progress," Dan Gard, Idaho
DOT |
|
• |
"Virginia
Since 1999," Antony Opperman, Virginia DOT |
|
• |
"California
Dreamin': What We Wanted and What We Got," (pdf 880
KB) Margaret Buss, Caltrans |
|
• |
"Turf
Wars: Highways, Public Lands, and Interagency Agreements," Julie
Francis, Wyoming DOT |
|
• |
"North
Carolina Department of Transportation Archaeological Predictive
Model: Field Verification and Implementation," Matt Wilkerson,
North Carolina DOT; Scott Madry, Environmental Services, Inc.;
and Benjamin Resnick, GAI Consultants, Inc. |
|
• |
"After
the Launch: The Curious History, Productive Present and Brave
New Future of the Pennsylvania CRGIS," Joseph Baker, Pennsylvania
DOT |
|
• |
"Past,
Project and Future: The Baltimore Transit Study's Use of GIS
for Project Streamlining and Stewardship," Henry Ward, Parsons
Brinkerhoff and Barbara Hsiao Silber, McCormick Taylor, Inc. |
Section Three:
Joint ABE80, ADC10, and ADC50 Session
"Tribal
Consultation, the National Environmental Policy Act, and Section
106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act"
|
• |
"Programmatic
Agreements and Tribal Section 106 Consultation: Some Oklahoma
Observations," (pdf 56 KB) John Hartley, Oklahoma
DOT |
|
• |
"Working
with State Departments of Transportation on Navajo Land: A Tribal
Perspective on Cultural Resource Management and Planning Issues," Ronald
Maldonado, Navajo Nation |
|
• |
"Tribal
Consultation Texas Style," (pdf 1016 KB) Owen Lindauer,
FHWA and
Jim Soctomah, Passamaquoddy and Narragansett Tribes |
|
• |
"A
Florida Perspective on Native
American Consultation," (pdf 1.3 MB) Kathleen
Hoffman, Janus Research |
|
• |
"Native
American Coordination
and Evaluating Cultural Resources," (pdf 5.6 MB) George Ballo, Florida
DOT |
Section Four: Facilitated
Group Discussions
Conference participants
broke out into groups to discuss the conference theme, using information,
ideas, projects, etc. discussed in earlier sessions, and their own
experiences. Each group worked on defining what the goals and outcomes
of streamlining and stewardship should be. These goals and outcomes
need to be practical, reasonably attainable, and easily understandable
by all. Groups also discussed practical ways to move streamlining
and stewardship toward fulfilling these goals. Click
here for notes
from the group discussions.
Section
Five: Conference Wrap-up Session
Brief presentations/reports
by breakout discussion groups.
General comments/discussion
from audience.
Plenary session
speakers presented their views and opinions about what they heard
during the sessions and small group discussions, ending with recommendations
on where to go from here. Click
here for notes from the audience discussion
and the plenary speakers' recommendations.
|